About hydrochar

Share this post
Carbon-negative Christmas trees?
hydrochar.substack.com

Carbon-negative Christmas trees?

Christmas trees belong to the many topics that pitch a long-standing tradition against the need for a carbon-negative economy, but there is no reason why the two things should be at loggerheads.

Oliver Beige
,
Fritz Keller
, and
About hydrochar
Dec 27, 2021
Share

The origins of the Christmas tree tradition are somewhat obscure, likely rooted in nature religions rather than Christianity. Today it’s a sizable industry, with plantation-grown firs, spruces, and pines making up the bulk of the Christmas trees on the market, plus an environmentally dubious sideline of artificial trees.

On the other hand, we see public calls for afforestation and “for every click we plant a tree” image campaigns geared towards environmentally-minded customers. How can we reconcile these two perspectives?

Photo by Ivan Bandura.

A Christmas tree plantation is at first blush a form of short rotation forestry, except the economic purpose of most fast-growing plantations is to provide raw materials for biofuels, while Christmas trees anchor a fortnight-long semi-pagan, semi-Christian tradition, after which they are discarded.

This juncture is where we can reconcile tradition with progress.

Expert criticism of “every click a tree” campaigns tends to focus on the short-termism of these campaigns, but this is not really the crux of the matter. For us, Christmas trees are first and foremost captured carbon, and if we have a six-to-ten year old tree on our hands (the typical growing period for a Christmas tree) or a hundred-year old tree, we have to find a way to stabilize the captured carbon for much longer periods than the lifespan of a tree.

This is where biochar, in its two forms of pyrochar and hydrochar, comes in.

To get the captured carbon of above-ground plants, be it conifers, bamboos, or poplars, underground and to stabilize it there we have to carbonize it first. A controlled agricultural process like short rotation forestry might indeed be the better environment to make sure as much carbon as possible is captured.

Trees, especially Christmas trees, are on the cusp between dry and wet biomass, so both of our preferred carbonization processes, pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization, can be applied.

Using some straightforward simplifying assumptions, we calculate that we could compensate roughly 1.2 million metric tons of CO2 using pyrolysis, or 2.8 million metric tons using hydrothermal carbonization, from all the Christmas trees produced in Europe and the United States alone. (More on this in next week’s newsletter.)

If we have dry wood and want to reuse the char for agricultural purposes, producing pyrochar makes more sense. Typical Christmas trees have a root depth of less than two meters, so turning any geological depression into arable land could use 90% hydrochar below a topsoil layer containing mostly pyrochar.

Reclaimed open pit mine using hydrochar fill and a pyrochar surface layer. Photo by Mika Baumeister.

About hydrochar
Hydrochar: the spectrum of possibilities
Over the last few weeks in this newsletter, we tried to advocate for hydrothermal carbonization, a technical solution to the carbon emissions problem that is simple to implement, including decentrally in emerging economies, relies on well-established chemical processes, and offers a range of end products that can be returned into a carbon-neutral econom…
Read more
5 months ago · Oliver Beige and About hydrochar
About hydrochar
From biomass to hydrochar and beyond
In the last newsletters we looked at wet biomass as input, the various carbonization processes, and the available uses of hydrochar (and biochar) to enable a sustainable carbon economy. In this newsletter, we offer a few examples from recent research about how these components tie together. We will get back to these and other examples in more detail lat…
Read more
7 months ago · About hydrochar, Fritz Keller, and Oliver Beige
About hydrochar
Remoorestation: recreating peatlands with hydrochar
Peatlands, coming in a variety of forms such as moors, bogs, (quag)mires, muskegs, or fens, are characterized by the prevalence of peat (also known as turf): organic matter in various stages of decomposition under various conditions, from tropical to arctic, from lowlands to mountainous highlands, from waterlogged to (comparatively) dry, from hardy gra…
Read more
6 months ago · 1 like · Fritz Keller, Oliver Beige, and About hydrochar
ShareShare
A guest post by
Oliver Beige
Navigating turbulences
Subscribe to Oliver
A guest post by
Fritz Keller
PhD chemist with a faible for interdisciplinary solutions
Subscribe to Fritz
TopNew

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 About hydrochar
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing